Blind Signal Separation-Based Frequency-dependent I/Q Imbalance Compensation for Direct-conversion Receivers

Research Paper / Jan 2009

Cookies are important to the proper functioning of a website. To improve your experience, we use cookies to remember log-in details and provide secure log-in, collect statistics to optimize site functionality, and deliver content tailored to your interests. By continuing to browse or closing this banner, you indicate your agreement.

- Home /

Blind Signal Separation-Based Frequency-dependent I/Q Imbalance Compensation for Direct-conversion Receivers

Research Paper / Jan 2009

The fifth generation of mobile networks, commonly known as 5G, holds a lot of promise. Historically, 2G brought us mobile voice, while 3G introduced us to mobile data. 4G and LTE enabled usable mobile broadband services and now 5G is supposed to unlock further value from our mobile networks with...

The global economy is experiencing rapid changes during the first years of the 21st century, with new technologies, concepts, and behaviors now changing the way we live and work. Blockchain, self-driving cars, Artificial Intelligence, and machine learning, Three-Dimensional (3D) printing, and Augmented Reality (AR) are just a few examples of...

View the slides from our demonstration of 360 Video Standards from MWC19!

BLOG / Feb 2019
/
MWC19,
IDCCatMWC19,
IDCC,
InterDigital,
MWC,
Mobile World Congress,
MWL
/ Posted By: The InterDigital Communications Team

BLOG / Jan 2019
/
MWC19,
IDCCatMWC19,
IDCC,
InterDigital,
MWC,
Mobile World Congress,
MWL
/ Posted By: The InterDigital Communications Team

Blind Signal Separation-Based Frequency-dependent I/Q Imbalance Compensation for Direct-conversion Receivers �

Chia-Pang Yen, Yingming Tsai, and Robert Olesen

InterDigital Communications LLC

2 Huntington Quadrangle

Melville, NY 11747, USA

Chia-Pang.Yen@, Yingming.Tsai@, Robert.Olesen@interdigital.com

�

Abstract— Frequency-dependent I/Q imbalance is one of the concerns in the design of a high data rate wireless wideband direct-conversion receiver (DCR). To address this challenge, a blind signal separation method, based on a conjugate signal model is proposed. Necessary and sufficient conditions for signal separation are derived, and a gradient-based method is used to solve this problem. The performance of our approach is evaluated for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems.

Keywords: Radio frequency (RF), direct-conversion receiver (DCR), I/Q imbalance, blind signal separation, orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signals.

Introduction

The evolution of wireless communication systems has driven the design and implementation of the radio transceivers. Next generation of wireless communication networks (for example, 3GPP LTE system) will support a high data rate, which requires efficient wideband radio design in the terminals. Driven by those demands, I/Q down-conversion have become a key design issue in addressing the need for cost- and size-efficient transceiver implementation.

In commonly used direct-conversion front-end receivers, the received signal is I/Q down-converted from RF directly to a baseband signal. Due to an imperfect oscillator, and low pass filters in the RF front-end receiver, the In-phase and Q-phase signal paths will inevitably have mismatches of amplitude and phase. This causes interference upon down conversion to baseband. Direct-conversion receivers are vulnerable to I/Q imbalance since I/Q separation is performed early in the RF/analog portion. The impact of I/Q imbalance is more severe to a system which uses high order modulations, and a high coding rate. Therefore, I/Q imbalance correction is essential for the design of higher data rate systems.

Many I/Q imbalance estimation and compensation methods that require specific training signals patterns have been proposed, see for example [5], [6]. However, the requirement for specific training patterns may not be a practical assumption. Thus, there is a need for blind signal processing methods. To the best of our knowledge, there are not many blind frequency-dependent I/Q imbalance compensation methods for DCR published. Authors in [3] and [4] propose methods using the statistical properties of the source signal. The contributions of this paper are two-fold. First, a necessary and sufficient condition for separation of the convolutive mixtures of the desired signal and its image using blind estimation is proved. Second, based on this condition, a compensation method is proposed and demonstrated.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section II, the frequency-dependent I/Q imbalance model are described. In Section III, The conditions for signal separation are derived and a gradient based method is used to solve for a separation filter. In Section IV., the simulation results are obtained for an OFDM system. Finally, conclusions are drawn in Section V.

Notation: Bold face upper case symbols, e.g.,

denotes matrices, and bold face lower case symbols, e.g.,

, denotes column vectors. The

the element of matrix

is denoted as

.

is a composite vector obtained by stacking column vectors together. The asterisk * denotes complex conjugate.

is the expected value.

is the Frobenius norm of

.

denotes conjugate transpose of a matrix.

denotes the trace of a matrix.

is used to denote the linear convolution.

I/Q imbalance Signal model and second-order statistic property

System Model

A typical block diagram of the RF front-end for DCR is presented in Fig. 1(a), and its equivalent mathematical model is given in Fig. 1(b). The received RF signal

is expressed as,

(1)

where

is the received baseband signal

, and

, and

is the transmitted signal. The received signals

are direct downconverted by a local oscillator signal

where

and

are the the mismatched gain and phase.

The downconverted signal

is expressed as

(2)

where

and

denote low pass filters for the

and

branch shown in Fig. 1(b) and

. After carrying out the low pass filtering and transforming equation (2) to the frequency domain, the I and Q branch signals are

(3)

and

. (4)

Then the received frequency domain baseband signals

can be expressed as

where

(5)

and

. (6)

or equivalantly in the time-domain,

. (7)

Hence, we can see that due to the I/Q imbalance, the received down-conversion signal

is distorted by its image signal

.

To evaluate the I/Q imbalance distortion, the analog front-end image-reject ratio (IRR) [1], in decibels (dB), is defined as

(8)

After sampling the continuous time signal

with sampling interval

, the discrete time signal is

. (9)

Second-order statistics

The discrete-time autocorrelation function (ACF) of a complex random signal

is defined as

. Another second-order statistics, the complementary autocorrelation function (CACF), is defined as

. If a complex random signal

is proper, then its CACF is equal to zero for all lag

[7], i.e.,

. In this paper, we assume the transmitted complex signal

is a zero-mean white process, i.e.,

and is proper, i.e.,

(10)

where

denote the Dirac delta function. The above assumption is a reasonable assumption because most communication systems, specifically those which have encoders or interleavers to achieve this condition.

In this paper, we further assume that the channels are wide-sense stationary uncorrelated scattering (WSSUS). It can be shown that a white and proper process, after a WSSUS channel, remains white and proper. The signal after a time-varying channel can be expressed as,

. The autocorrelation of a WSSUS channel impulse response is given by [14],

�� EMBED Equation.3

where

is a function that depends on

,

is the zero-order Bessel function of first kind, and

represents the maximum Doppler shift. Using this autocorrelation, the ACF of received signal

can be computed as,

, thus it is still a white process. Similarly, its CACF can be evaluated as,

.

The properness of

follows from the fact that

is proper.

Blind signal separation for I/Q imbalance using conjugate signal model

If the filters

and

are modeled by

tap length FIR filters [8], the time-domain frequency-selective I/Q imbalance in (9) can be rewritten in the following conjugate model:

(11)

where

,

and

where

.

The objective of signal separation is to make the filter output a scaled and delayed version of the input [13]. Mathematically, the goal is to find a separation filter

with length

such that the signals and its image,

and

, are separated at the filter output, i.e.,

(12)

where

is a

permutation matrix, either

or

,

is a

diagonal scaling matrix and

is a delay.

In order to achieve the separation, prior information about the source signals, i.e., conjugation between these two signals needs to be imposed. This motivates us to come up with a cost function that incorporates this conjugate constraint. With this constraint, and the goal to restore the property of signal

, a necessary and sufficient condition for signal separation can be proved as in Lemma 1.

Remark 1: After the separation filter, the output is a delayed and filtered version of

.Therefore, the delay and the effective channel should be estimated then equalized prior to decoding. This is not a big issue since although a known training signal does not exist but most systems do have pilot symbols. For example, in LTE, the pilot symbols are inserted every six subcarriers in the frequency domain. These pilot symbols can be used for estimating the delay and equalization. Since these are not the scope of this paper, they are assumed to be perfectly known in the simulations. The permutation matrix

can also be identified in this manner.

Remark 2: Since

is white and proper, it can be shown that the autocorrelation matrix of

equal to a diagonal matrix,

(13)

Conditions for signal separation

In order to satisfy the conjugate condition for the elements of the filter output, i.e.

, we need to impose the following constraints on the elements of the filter matrices, i.e.

and

.

Define the composite vector

. By equation (12), this composite vector

can be written as

(14)

where

is a Toeplitz matrix composed of

and

.

We are now ready to derive the conditions which lead to signal separation.

Lemma 1: Under the constraints

and

,

are separator matrices, that is

, if and only if

Proof: The sufficient condition can be shown by plugging equation (12) into (14) then using equation (13). That is

, when

.

Now we proceed to prove the necessary condition. By looking at the matrix equation

element by element, i.e.

,

we can obtain the following conditions for

.

(15)

and

(16)

From equation (12), the filter output

can be written as

(17)

where

and

are filters depend on

and

. Then from (15)

(18)

where

is signal power and

. One can conclude that equation (18) can be satisfied when

or

is an anti-symmetric thus must be a non-causal filter. The latter case can be excluded and we can conclude that

. Without loss of generality, let us assume

. Then

in (17) becomes

(19)

Plug equation (18) into equation (15), and we have

, (20)

which implies

is an all-pass filter. It can be shown that for FIR all-pass filters, all the zeros are at the origin of the

-plane, thus, must have a linear phase. Therefore,

for delay

. One can see that the output of the filter is just a scaling and delayed version of

, i.e.

. Similarly, if

, then

which leads to

. Recall that, by construction,

, therefore

.

Implementation

In Lemma

, we prove that the autocorrelation matrix of filter output signal

is the necessary and sufficient condition for signal separation. Therefore, we define the following cost function

. (21)

Then the separation matrices

can be obtained by minimizing the cost function

. (22)

Here we proposed a gradient-based method [11] to iteratively solve the problem. At each step, the gradient of the cost function, i.e.

, is computed and the argument

is updated by stepping along the gradient direction. Note that in complex domain, the gradient direction is the derivative with respect to

instead of

.

Based on the fact that

equation (21) can be expressed as

(23)

where matrix

is defined as the

submatrix of

, where

is composed of the

submatrices

.

The term

can be expanded as

��EMBED Equation.3

(24)

Similarly, the term

is expressed as

(25)

Observing equations (24) and (25), we find out that the derivatives needed are of the form

and

, where

and

are

submatrices from

. Based on [12], the results of these derivatives are given as follows, without lengthy step by step details. Note that the gradient is the derivative w.r.t.

instead of

[11].

(26)

where

.

Similarly,

(27)

The cost function is minimized iteratively by the learning rule

(28)

where

is the matrices at

the step,

is the learning rate and

.

At each step,

is also updated by

(29)

Performance Analysis and Numerical Results

In this section, simulation results are presented to demonstrate the performance of the proposed blind compensation scheme for OFDM systems. The simulated OFDM system is with symbol length

subcarriers, guard symbol

, and subcarrier spacing

kHz [9]. Hence - the total symbol length is equal to

samples per OFDM symbol. We consider two different cases. Case 1_3-tap LPF: The I/Q imbalance parameters are; gain mismatch

, phase mismatch

and I and Q branch LPF

,

respectively [8] where the analog IRR is in the range of 18-25 dB [Fig. 2(a)]. Case 2_ 2-tap LPF: The frequency-dependent I/Q imbalance parameters are

,

,

and

[8] where the analog front end IRR is around 26-35 dB [Fig. 3(a)]. Both simulations use the learning rate

and with initial values

,

and

. This is justified by the fact that, in practical, the LPFs on both I and Q branch are close to an ideal, thus its impulse response is close to a delta function. In the simulations, 50,000 samples are used for estimating the autocorrelation function, 64-QAM modulation is used and the received SNR is 20dB. The convergence rate is shown in Fig. 2(b) and 3(b). The proposed method converges in approximately

and

iterations for case 1 and 2 respectively. In case 2 the LPFs are more ideal than in case 1, therefore it is not surprising that the simulation converges faster in case 2. In Fig.2 and 3, the performance of the proposed method is shown in terms of IRR. Figure 2(a) and 3(a) show that the IRR is improved by around 20 dB after I/Q imbalance compensation. Fig. 4 and 5 show the Symbol Error Rate (SER) performance before and after compensation. The results show that there is a need to compensate for the I/Q imbalance in both cases, since without compensation, the performance is unacceptable. Fig. 4 and 5 also show that the proposed compensation scheme provides an effective removal of the imbalance, and also improves the BER performance.

Conclusion

In this paper, a blind signal separation approach is proposed to compensate for a frequency-dependent I/Q imbalance in a wideband direct-conversion receiver. Necessary and sufficient conditions for signal separation are derived. Based on the conditions a gradient-based method is used to solve for the separation filter. Simulation results show the proposed approach effectively removes distortion caused by the I/Q imbalance.

References

P. Kiss and V. Prodanov, “One-tap wideband I/Q compensation for zero-IF filters,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—Part I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, vol. 51, pp. 1062–1074, June 2004.

A. A. Abidi, “Direct-conversion radio transceivers for digital communications,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, pp. 1399–1410, Dec. 1995.

M. Valkama, M. Renfores, and V. K.oivunen, “Blind I/Q signal separation based solutions for receiver signal processing,” in EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing - Special Issue on DSP Enabled Radios, vol. 2005, no. 16, pp. 2708-2718, Sept. 2005.

L. Anttila, M. Valkama, and M. Renfors, “Circularity-based I/Q imbalance compensation in wideband direct-conversion receivers ” Proc. IEEE,Trans. Vehicular Technology, vol 99, issue 99 pp 1-15, Sep 2007.

A. Tarighat, R. Bagheri, and A. H. Sayed, “Compensation schemes and performance analysis of I/Q imbalances in OFDM receivers,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 3257–3268, Aug. 2005.

A. Schuchert, R. Hasholzner, and P. Antoine, “A novel IQ imbalance compensation scheme for the reception of OFDM signals,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 313–318, Aug. 2001.

F. D. Neeser and J. L. Massey, “Proper complex random processes with applications to information theory,” IEEE Trans.

Inform. Theory, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1293–1302, Nov. 1993.

M. Valkama, M. Renfores, and V. K.oivunen, “Compensation of frequency-selective I/Q imbalances in wideband receivers: Models and algorithms,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop on Signal Processing Advances for Wireless Commun. (SPAWC’01), 2001, pp. 42–45.

Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Channels and Modulation, 3GPP Std. 36.211, V8.2.0, Mar. 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.3gpp.org

J. G. Proakis, Digital Signal Processing - Principles, Algorithms, and Applications. Prentice Hall, 1996.

S. Haykin, Adaptive Filter Theory. Prentice Hall, 1996.

A. HØjrungnes and D. Gesbert, “Complex-valued matrix differentiation: Techniques and key results,” IEEE Trans. Signal

Processing, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2740–2746, June 2007.

A. Cichocki and S. Amari, Adaptive blind signal and image processing, Wiley, 2005.

P. Hoeher, “A statistical discrete-time model for the WSSUS multipath channel,” IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology., vol. 41, no. 4, pp461-468, Nov. 1992.

Figure 1: (a) Frequency-dependent I/Q imbalance of direct-conversion receiver (b) Mathematical model of a DRR with I/Q imbalance (c) Equivalent mathematical model of (b).

Figure 2: 3-tap LPF case

(a) IRR in before and after compensation (b) Convergence of the cost function.

Figure 3: 2-tap LPF case

a) IRR before and after compensation (b) Convergence of the cost function.

Figure 4: Symbol Error Rate for 3-tap LPF case

Figure 5: Symbol Error Rate for 2-tap LPF case

�

�PAGE �

�PAGE �3�

_1292844926.unknown

_1293023720.unknown

_1298979362.unknown

_1298985980.unknown

_1299326456.unknown

_1299326597.unknown

_1299328013.unknown

_1299418171.unknown

_1299328090.unknown

_1299327709.unknown

_1299326501.unknown

_1299311981.unknown

_1299313244.unknown

_1299326090.unknown

_1299326093.unknown

_1299325486.unknown

_1299312802.unknown

_1298987091.unknown

_1298987412.unknown

_1299311946.unknown

_1298987213.vsd

(overflow,LoP)

1

I

LNA

LPF

LPF

A/D

A/D

Q

I/Q LO (gd, Φ)

I/Q Imbalance compensator

Analog Front End

Digital Baseband

y(t)

r(t)

AGC

(a)

I

GI(f)

GQ(f)

I/Q LO

r(t)

Q

(b)

_1298986903.unknown

_1298984175.unknown

_1298984381.unknown

_1298984457.unknown

_1298984577.unknown

_1298984432.unknown

_1298984257.unknown

_1298981855.unknown

_1298983831.unknown

_1298984052.unknown

_1298982789.unknown

_1298982949.unknown

_1298982666.unknown

_1298979641.unknown

_1298980935.unknown

_1298981750.unknown

_1298980701.unknown

_1298979431.unknown

_1296550251.unknown

_1296552409.unknown

_1298968648.unknown

_1298978448.unknown

_1298978480.unknown

_1298968711.unknown

_1298969164.unknown

_1298978438.unknown

_1298968818.unknown

_1298968703.unknown

_1296552546.unknown

_1298967209.unknown

_1298968615.unknown

_1296552855.unknown

_1298967182.unknown

_1296552852.unknown

_1296552527.unknown

_1296552255.unknown

_1296552333.unknown

_1296550324.unknown

_1293024294.unknown

_1293267219.unknown

_1296034851.unknown

_1296549864.unknown

_1296026482.unknown

_1296026580.unknown

_1293024329.unknown

_1293024342.unknown

_1293023929.unknown

_1293024081.unknown

_1293024128.unknown

_1293023937.unknown

_1293023960.unknown

_1293023783.unknown

_1293023876.unknown

_1293023834.unknown

_1293023749.unknown

_1293023724.unknown

_1292852795.unknown

_1292920830.unknown

_1292920865.unknown

_1292920880.unknown

_1292920885.unknown

_1292921841.unknown

_1292921844.unknown

_1292920883.unknown

_1292920873.unknown

_1292920877.unknown

_1292920869.unknown

_1292920858.unknown

_1292920862.unknown

_1292920853.unknown

_1292920518.unknown

_1292920814.unknown

_1292920827.unknown

_1292920808.unknown

_1292920811.unknown

_1292920803.unknown

_1292855500.unknown

_1292859486.unknown

_1292920108.unknown

_1292855833.unknown

_1292855840.unknown

_1292853458.unknown

_1292853465.unknown

_1292853187.unknown

_1292848396.unknown

_1292850178.unknown

_1292850483.unknown

_1292852691.unknown

_1292852706.unknown

_1292850602.unknown

_1292852426.unknown

_1292850218.unknown

_1292849018.unknown

_1292849021.unknown

_1292849212.unknown

_1292849238.unknown

_1292849798.unknown

_1292849047.unknown

_1292849019.unknown

_1292848508.unknown

_1292849017.unknown

_1292848993.unknown

_1292848407.unknown

_1292845092.unknown

_1292845854.unknown

_1292847567.unknown

_1292845731.unknown

_1292844964.unknown

_1292845064.unknown

_1292768313.unknown

_1292836951.unknown

_1292837647.unknown

_1292837895.unknown

_1292838111.unknown

_1292838675.unknown

_1292838730.unknown

_1292838123.unknown

_1292837919.unknown

_1292837931.unknown

_1292837898.unknown

_1292837659.unknown

_1292837633.unknown

_1292837639.unknown

_1292837507.unknown

_1292837622.unknown

_1292837138.unknown

_1292768910.unknown

_1292834837.unknown

_1292836061.unknown

_1292836814.unknown

_1292836136.unknown

_1292836058.unknown

_1292769095.unknown

_1292834819.unknown

_1292768929.unknown

_1292768996.unknown

_1292768931.unknown

_1292768919.unknown

_1292768925.unknown

_1292768872.unknown

_1292768895.unknown

_1292768898.unknown

_1292768880.unknown

_1292768853.unknown

_1292768869.unknown

_1292768819.unknown

_1292763842.unknown

_1292764199.unknown

_1292765992.unknown

_1292767066.unknown

_1292768155.unknown

_1292768212.unknown

_1292768260.unknown

_1292768198.unknown

_1292767313.unknown

_1292766691.unknown

_1292766927.unknown

_1292766061.unknown

_1292765873.unknown

_1292765876.unknown

_1292765869.unknown

_1292764715.unknown

_1292764000.unknown

_1292764179.unknown

_1292764187.unknown

_1292764175.unknown

_1292763992.unknown

_1292763997.unknown

_1292763884.unknown

_1292763796.unknown

_1292763835.unknown

_1292763838.unknown

_1292763831.unknown

_1292763750.unknown

_1292763792.unknown

_1264760985.unknown

_1292763743.unknown

_1261996555.unknown

_1261999549.unknown

Chia-Pang Yen, Yingming Tsai, and Robert Olesen

InterDigital Communications LLC

2 Huntington Quadrangle

Melville, NY 11747, USA

Chia-Pang.Yen@, Yingming.Tsai@, Robert.Olesen@interdigital.com

�

Abstract— Frequency-dependent I/Q imbalance is one of the concerns in the design of a high data rate wireless wideband direct-conversion receiver (DCR). To address this challenge, a blind signal separation method, based on a conjugate signal model is proposed. Necessary and sufficient conditions for signal separation are derived, and a gradient-based method is used to solve this problem. The performance of our approach is evaluated for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems.

Keywords: Radio frequency (RF), direct-conversion receiver (DCR), I/Q imbalance, blind signal separation, orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signals.

Introduction

The evolution of wireless communication systems has driven the design and implementation of the radio transceivers. Next generation of wireless communication networks (for example, 3GPP LTE system) will support a high data rate, which requires efficient wideband radio design in the terminals. Driven by those demands, I/Q down-conversion have become a key design issue in addressing the need for cost- and size-efficient transceiver implementation.

In commonly used direct-conversion front-end receivers, the received signal is I/Q down-converted from RF directly to a baseband signal. Due to an imperfect oscillator, and low pass filters in the RF front-end receiver, the In-phase and Q-phase signal paths will inevitably have mismatches of amplitude and phase. This causes interference upon down conversion to baseband. Direct-conversion receivers are vulnerable to I/Q imbalance since I/Q separation is performed early in the RF/analog portion. The impact of I/Q imbalance is more severe to a system which uses high order modulations, and a high coding rate. Therefore, I/Q imbalance correction is essential for the design of higher data rate systems.

Many I/Q imbalance estimation and compensation methods that require specific training signals patterns have been proposed, see for example [5], [6]. However, the requirement for specific training patterns may not be a practical assumption. Thus, there is a need for blind signal processing methods. To the best of our knowledge, there are not many blind frequency-dependent I/Q imbalance compensation methods for DCR published. Authors in [3] and [4] propose methods using the statistical properties of the source signal. The contributions of this paper are two-fold. First, a necessary and sufficient condition for separation of the convolutive mixtures of the desired signal and its image using blind estimation is proved. Second, based on this condition, a compensation method is proposed and demonstrated.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section II, the frequency-dependent I/Q imbalance model are described. In Section III, The conditions for signal separation are derived and a gradient based method is used to solve for a separation filter. In Section IV., the simulation results are obtained for an OFDM system. Finally, conclusions are drawn in Section V.

Notation: Bold face upper case symbols, e.g.,

denotes matrices, and bold face lower case symbols, e.g.,

, denotes column vectors. The

the element of matrix

is denoted as

.

is a composite vector obtained by stacking column vectors together. The asterisk * denotes complex conjugate.

is the expected value.

is the Frobenius norm of

.

denotes conjugate transpose of a matrix.

denotes the trace of a matrix.

is used to denote the linear convolution.

I/Q imbalance Signal model and second-order statistic property

System Model

A typical block diagram of the RF front-end for DCR is presented in Fig. 1(a), and its equivalent mathematical model is given in Fig. 1(b). The received RF signal

is expressed as,

(1)

where

is the received baseband signal

, and

, and

is the transmitted signal. The received signals

are direct downconverted by a local oscillator signal

where

and

are the the mismatched gain and phase.

The downconverted signal

is expressed as

(2)

where

and

denote low pass filters for the

and

branch shown in Fig. 1(b) and

. After carrying out the low pass filtering and transforming equation (2) to the frequency domain, the I and Q branch signals are

(3)

and

. (4)

Then the received frequency domain baseband signals

can be expressed as

where

(5)

and

. (6)

or equivalantly in the time-domain,

. (7)

Hence, we can see that due to the I/Q imbalance, the received down-conversion signal

is distorted by its image signal

.

To evaluate the I/Q imbalance distortion, the analog front-end image-reject ratio (IRR) [1], in decibels (dB), is defined as

(8)

After sampling the continuous time signal

with sampling interval

, the discrete time signal is

. (9)

Second-order statistics

The discrete-time autocorrelation function (ACF) of a complex random signal

is defined as

. Another second-order statistics, the complementary autocorrelation function (CACF), is defined as

. If a complex random signal

is proper, then its CACF is equal to zero for all lag

[7], i.e.,

. In this paper, we assume the transmitted complex signal

is a zero-mean white process, i.e.,

and is proper, i.e.,

(10)

where

denote the Dirac delta function. The above assumption is a reasonable assumption because most communication systems, specifically those which have encoders or interleavers to achieve this condition.

In this paper, we further assume that the channels are wide-sense stationary uncorrelated scattering (WSSUS). It can be shown that a white and proper process, after a WSSUS channel, remains white and proper. The signal after a time-varying channel can be expressed as,

. The autocorrelation of a WSSUS channel impulse response is given by [14],

�� EMBED Equation.3

where

is a function that depends on

,

is the zero-order Bessel function of first kind, and

represents the maximum Doppler shift. Using this autocorrelation, the ACF of received signal

can be computed as,

, thus it is still a white process. Similarly, its CACF can be evaluated as,

.

The properness of

follows from the fact that

is proper.

Blind signal separation for I/Q imbalance using conjugate signal model

If the filters

and

are modeled by

tap length FIR filters [8], the time-domain frequency-selective I/Q imbalance in (9) can be rewritten in the following conjugate model:

(11)

where

,

and

where

.

The objective of signal separation is to make the filter output a scaled and delayed version of the input [13]. Mathematically, the goal is to find a separation filter

with length

such that the signals and its image,

and

, are separated at the filter output, i.e.,

(12)

where

is a

permutation matrix, either

or

,

is a

diagonal scaling matrix and

is a delay.

In order to achieve the separation, prior information about the source signals, i.e., conjugation between these two signals needs to be imposed. This motivates us to come up with a cost function that incorporates this conjugate constraint. With this constraint, and the goal to restore the property of signal

, a necessary and sufficient condition for signal separation can be proved as in Lemma 1.

Remark 1: After the separation filter, the output is a delayed and filtered version of

.Therefore, the delay and the effective channel should be estimated then equalized prior to decoding. This is not a big issue since although a known training signal does not exist but most systems do have pilot symbols. For example, in LTE, the pilot symbols are inserted every six subcarriers in the frequency domain. These pilot symbols can be used for estimating the delay and equalization. Since these are not the scope of this paper, they are assumed to be perfectly known in the simulations. The permutation matrix

can also be identified in this manner.

Remark 2: Since

is white and proper, it can be shown that the autocorrelation matrix of

equal to a diagonal matrix,

(13)

Conditions for signal separation

In order to satisfy the conjugate condition for the elements of the filter output, i.e.

, we need to impose the following constraints on the elements of the filter matrices, i.e.

and

.

Define the composite vector

. By equation (12), this composite vector

can be written as

(14)

where

is a Toeplitz matrix composed of

and

.

We are now ready to derive the conditions which lead to signal separation.

Lemma 1: Under the constraints

and

,

are separator matrices, that is

, if and only if

Proof: The sufficient condition can be shown by plugging equation (12) into (14) then using equation (13). That is

, when

.

Now we proceed to prove the necessary condition. By looking at the matrix equation

element by element, i.e.

,

we can obtain the following conditions for

.

(15)

and

(16)

From equation (12), the filter output

can be written as

(17)

where

and

are filters depend on

and

. Then from (15)

(18)

where

is signal power and

. One can conclude that equation (18) can be satisfied when

or

is an anti-symmetric thus must be a non-causal filter. The latter case can be excluded and we can conclude that

. Without loss of generality, let us assume

. Then

in (17) becomes

(19)

Plug equation (18) into equation (15), and we have

, (20)

which implies

is an all-pass filter. It can be shown that for FIR all-pass filters, all the zeros are at the origin of the

-plane, thus, must have a linear phase. Therefore,

for delay

. One can see that the output of the filter is just a scaling and delayed version of

, i.e.

. Similarly, if

, then

which leads to

. Recall that, by construction,

, therefore

.

Implementation

In Lemma

, we prove that the autocorrelation matrix of filter output signal

is the necessary and sufficient condition for signal separation. Therefore, we define the following cost function

. (21)

Then the separation matrices

can be obtained by minimizing the cost function

. (22)

Here we proposed a gradient-based method [11] to iteratively solve the problem. At each step, the gradient of the cost function, i.e.

, is computed and the argument

is updated by stepping along the gradient direction. Note that in complex domain, the gradient direction is the derivative with respect to

instead of

.

Based on the fact that

equation (21) can be expressed as

(23)

where matrix

is defined as the

submatrix of

, where

is composed of the

submatrices

.

The term

can be expanded as

��EMBED Equation.3

(24)

Similarly, the term

is expressed as

(25)

Observing equations (24) and (25), we find out that the derivatives needed are of the form

and

, where

and

are

submatrices from

. Based on [12], the results of these derivatives are given as follows, without lengthy step by step details. Note that the gradient is the derivative w.r.t.

instead of

[11].

(26)

where

.

Similarly,

(27)

The cost function is minimized iteratively by the learning rule

(28)

where

is the matrices at

the step,

is the learning rate and

.

At each step,

is also updated by

(29)

Performance Analysis and Numerical Results

In this section, simulation results are presented to demonstrate the performance of the proposed blind compensation scheme for OFDM systems. The simulated OFDM system is with symbol length

subcarriers, guard symbol

, and subcarrier spacing

kHz [9]. Hence - the total symbol length is equal to

samples per OFDM symbol. We consider two different cases. Case 1_3-tap LPF: The I/Q imbalance parameters are; gain mismatch

, phase mismatch

and I and Q branch LPF

,

respectively [8] where the analog IRR is in the range of 18-25 dB [Fig. 2(a)]. Case 2_ 2-tap LPF: The frequency-dependent I/Q imbalance parameters are

,

,

and

[8] where the analog front end IRR is around 26-35 dB [Fig. 3(a)]. Both simulations use the learning rate

and with initial values

,

and

. This is justified by the fact that, in practical, the LPFs on both I and Q branch are close to an ideal, thus its impulse response is close to a delta function. In the simulations, 50,000 samples are used for estimating the autocorrelation function, 64-QAM modulation is used and the received SNR is 20dB. The convergence rate is shown in Fig. 2(b) and 3(b). The proposed method converges in approximately

and

iterations for case 1 and 2 respectively. In case 2 the LPFs are more ideal than in case 1, therefore it is not surprising that the simulation converges faster in case 2. In Fig.2 and 3, the performance of the proposed method is shown in terms of IRR. Figure 2(a) and 3(a) show that the IRR is improved by around 20 dB after I/Q imbalance compensation. Fig. 4 and 5 show the Symbol Error Rate (SER) performance before and after compensation. The results show that there is a need to compensate for the I/Q imbalance in both cases, since without compensation, the performance is unacceptable. Fig. 4 and 5 also show that the proposed compensation scheme provides an effective removal of the imbalance, and also improves the BER performance.

Conclusion

In this paper, a blind signal separation approach is proposed to compensate for a frequency-dependent I/Q imbalance in a wideband direct-conversion receiver. Necessary and sufficient conditions for signal separation are derived. Based on the conditions a gradient-based method is used to solve for the separation filter. Simulation results show the proposed approach effectively removes distortion caused by the I/Q imbalance.

References

P. Kiss and V. Prodanov, “One-tap wideband I/Q compensation for zero-IF filters,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—Part I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, vol. 51, pp. 1062–1074, June 2004.

A. A. Abidi, “Direct-conversion radio transceivers for digital communications,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, pp. 1399–1410, Dec. 1995.

M. Valkama, M. Renfores, and V. K.oivunen, “Blind I/Q signal separation based solutions for receiver signal processing,” in EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing - Special Issue on DSP Enabled Radios, vol. 2005, no. 16, pp. 2708-2718, Sept. 2005.

L. Anttila, M. Valkama, and M. Renfors, “Circularity-based I/Q imbalance compensation in wideband direct-conversion receivers ” Proc. IEEE,Trans. Vehicular Technology, vol 99, issue 99 pp 1-15, Sep 2007.

A. Tarighat, R. Bagheri, and A. H. Sayed, “Compensation schemes and performance analysis of I/Q imbalances in OFDM receivers,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 3257–3268, Aug. 2005.

A. Schuchert, R. Hasholzner, and P. Antoine, “A novel IQ imbalance compensation scheme for the reception of OFDM signals,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 313–318, Aug. 2001.

F. D. Neeser and J. L. Massey, “Proper complex random processes with applications to information theory,” IEEE Trans.

Inform. Theory, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1293–1302, Nov. 1993.

M. Valkama, M. Renfores, and V. K.oivunen, “Compensation of frequency-selective I/Q imbalances in wideband receivers: Models and algorithms,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop on Signal Processing Advances for Wireless Commun. (SPAWC’01), 2001, pp. 42–45.

Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Channels and Modulation, 3GPP Std. 36.211, V8.2.0, Mar. 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.3gpp.org

J. G. Proakis, Digital Signal Processing - Principles, Algorithms, and Applications. Prentice Hall, 1996.

S. Haykin, Adaptive Filter Theory. Prentice Hall, 1996.

A. HØjrungnes and D. Gesbert, “Complex-valued matrix differentiation: Techniques and key results,” IEEE Trans. Signal

Processing, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2740–2746, June 2007.

A. Cichocki and S. Amari, Adaptive blind signal and image processing, Wiley, 2005.

P. Hoeher, “A statistical discrete-time model for the WSSUS multipath channel,” IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology., vol. 41, no. 4, pp461-468, Nov. 1992.

Figure 1: (a) Frequency-dependent I/Q imbalance of direct-conversion receiver (b) Mathematical model of a DRR with I/Q imbalance (c) Equivalent mathematical model of (b).

Figure 2: 3-tap LPF case

(a) IRR in before and after compensation (b) Convergence of the cost function.

Figure 3: 2-tap LPF case

a) IRR before and after compensation (b) Convergence of the cost function.

Figure 4: Symbol Error Rate for 3-tap LPF case

Figure 5: Symbol Error Rate for 2-tap LPF case

�

�PAGE �

�PAGE �3�

_1292844926.unknown

_1293023720.unknown

_1298979362.unknown

_1298985980.unknown

_1299326456.unknown

_1299326597.unknown

_1299328013.unknown

_1299418171.unknown

_1299328090.unknown

_1299327709.unknown

_1299326501.unknown

_1299311981.unknown

_1299313244.unknown

_1299326090.unknown

_1299326093.unknown

_1299325486.unknown

_1299312802.unknown

_1298987091.unknown

_1298987412.unknown

_1299311946.unknown

_1298987213.vsd

(overflow,LoP)

1

I

LNA

LPF

LPF

A/D

A/D

Q

I/Q LO (gd, Φ)

I/Q Imbalance compensator

Analog Front End

Digital Baseband

y(t)

r(t)

AGC

(a)

I

GI(f)

GQ(f)

I/Q LO

r(t)

Q

(b)

_1298986903.unknown

_1298984175.unknown

_1298984381.unknown

_1298984457.unknown

_1298984577.unknown

_1298984432.unknown

_1298984257.unknown

_1298981855.unknown

_1298983831.unknown

_1298984052.unknown

_1298982789.unknown

_1298982949.unknown

_1298982666.unknown

_1298979641.unknown

_1298980935.unknown

_1298981750.unknown

_1298980701.unknown

_1298979431.unknown

_1296550251.unknown

_1296552409.unknown

_1298968648.unknown

_1298978448.unknown

_1298978480.unknown

_1298968711.unknown

_1298969164.unknown

_1298978438.unknown

_1298968818.unknown

_1298968703.unknown

_1296552546.unknown

_1298967209.unknown

_1298968615.unknown

_1296552855.unknown

_1298967182.unknown

_1296552852.unknown

_1296552527.unknown

_1296552255.unknown

_1296552333.unknown

_1296550324.unknown

_1293024294.unknown

_1293267219.unknown

_1296034851.unknown

_1296549864.unknown

_1296026482.unknown

_1296026580.unknown

_1293024329.unknown

_1293024342.unknown

_1293023929.unknown

_1293024081.unknown

_1293024128.unknown

_1293023937.unknown

_1293023960.unknown

_1293023783.unknown

_1293023876.unknown

_1293023834.unknown

_1293023749.unknown

_1293023724.unknown

_1292852795.unknown

_1292920830.unknown

_1292920865.unknown

_1292920880.unknown

_1292920885.unknown

_1292921841.unknown

_1292921844.unknown

_1292920883.unknown

_1292920873.unknown

_1292920877.unknown

_1292920869.unknown

_1292920858.unknown

_1292920862.unknown

_1292920853.unknown

_1292920518.unknown

_1292920814.unknown

_1292920827.unknown

_1292920808.unknown

_1292920811.unknown

_1292920803.unknown

_1292855500.unknown

_1292859486.unknown

_1292920108.unknown

_1292855833.unknown

_1292855840.unknown

_1292853458.unknown

_1292853465.unknown

_1292853187.unknown

_1292848396.unknown

_1292850178.unknown

_1292850483.unknown

_1292852691.unknown

_1292852706.unknown

_1292850602.unknown

_1292852426.unknown

_1292850218.unknown

_1292849018.unknown

_1292849021.unknown

_1292849212.unknown

_1292849238.unknown

_1292849798.unknown

_1292849047.unknown

_1292849019.unknown

_1292848508.unknown

_1292849017.unknown

_1292848993.unknown

_1292848407.unknown

_1292845092.unknown

_1292845854.unknown

_1292847567.unknown

_1292845731.unknown

_1292844964.unknown

_1292845064.unknown

_1292768313.unknown

_1292836951.unknown

_1292837647.unknown

_1292837895.unknown

_1292838111.unknown

_1292838675.unknown

_1292838730.unknown

_1292838123.unknown

_1292837919.unknown

_1292837931.unknown

_1292837898.unknown

_1292837659.unknown

_1292837633.unknown

_1292837639.unknown

_1292837507.unknown

_1292837622.unknown

_1292837138.unknown

_1292768910.unknown

_1292834837.unknown

_1292836061.unknown

_1292836814.unknown

_1292836136.unknown

_1292836058.unknown

_1292769095.unknown

_1292834819.unknown

_1292768929.unknown

_1292768996.unknown

_1292768931.unknown

_1292768919.unknown

_1292768925.unknown

_1292768872.unknown

_1292768895.unknown

_1292768898.unknown

_1292768880.unknown

_1292768853.unknown

_1292768869.unknown

_1292768819.unknown

_1292763842.unknown

_1292764199.unknown

_1292765992.unknown

_1292767066.unknown

_1292768155.unknown

_1292768212.unknown

_1292768260.unknown

_1292768198.unknown

_1292767313.unknown

_1292766691.unknown

_1292766927.unknown

_1292766061.unknown

_1292765873.unknown

_1292765876.unknown

_1292765869.unknown

_1292764715.unknown

_1292764000.unknown

_1292764179.unknown

_1292764187.unknown

_1292764175.unknown

_1292763992.unknown

_1292763997.unknown

_1292763884.unknown

_1292763796.unknown

_1292763835.unknown

_1292763838.unknown

_1292763831.unknown

_1292763750.unknown

_1292763792.unknown

_1264760985.unknown

_1292763743.unknown

_1261996555.unknown

_1261999549.unknown

InterDigital develops mobile technologies that are at the core of devices, networks, and services worldwide. We solve many of the industry's most critical and complex technical challenges, inventing solutions for more efficient broadband networks and a richer multimedia experience years ahead of market deployment.

© Copyright 2019 InterDigital, Inc. All Rights Reserved